Theories about ‘independence and neutrality’ of
trade unions
George Mavrikos, General Secretary of the WFTU
World Federation of Trade Unions in Copenhagen, Denmark,
14 November 2012
The reactionary changes globally over the last 20 years
and the temporary dominance of the forces of capital and reformism at the
political and ideological levels revived old theories about the “independence”
and the “neutrality” of the trade unions. These perceptions claim that the
coordination of the struggle of the workers in a class-oriented direction
limits this struggle, subordinates it to political priorities and traps it into
paths that are not serving the interests of the working class of each
respective country. Naturally, the forces of capital and their supporters in
the reformist trade unions are not only satisfied by such perceptions, but
promote them and maintain them as, supposedly, modern and progressive.
In no case are these theories new theories. They are old
theories. Such theories were expressed in the interior of the WFTU, even from
the first Congress in 1945 in Paris, when the representatives of some trade
unions, in particular the British and the Dutch, demanded that WFTU remain
neutral towards the issue of colonialism, using the fraudulent excuse that “it
is not a trade union issue”.
The confrontation was hard. The British and the Dutch
were vehemently confronted by trade union leaders like the Indian S.A Dange,
the Cuban Lazaro Pena, the Chinese Liu Chang Cheng, the Soviet Kuznetsov and
others. After the vote, the resolution of the founding Congress of the WFTU
says: “it would have been an uncomplete victory if the people of the colonies
and the territories of all the countries were deprived by their rights in
self-determination and national independence.”
At each historic turn and retreat, the trade union
movement had to confront such voices that urged it to adjust to “the new
realities”. Historical experience, however, proves that the great achievements
of the trade unions and the working class have been accomplished when the trade
unions were guided in their economic struggle by a clear orientation regarding
the final objectives of the class struggle, when they strengthened their
international proletarian coordination in opposition to the internationalized
forces of capital and its agents in the trade union movement. The degeneration
of trade union leaderships, such as the one of CGT France or CGIL Italy, who
were once class-oriented and rooted in the factories and the working places, is
a result of such a retreat from the historical lessons of the class struggle .
And the problem is not the degeneration and bankruptcy of the trade union
bureaucracy, but the illusions that it cultivated in the working masses, the
disarming of honest militants, the orientation towards “social partnership” and
“class conciliation and peace”.
This is why several specific questions are worth
answering once more.
a) “Independence” and “neutrality” vis-a-vis the final
goals of the struggle of the proletariat for the overthrow of capitalism and
the abolition of the exploitation of human by human?
Although the trade unions can certainly not initiate such
a revolutionary change, only through such a change will they accomplish their
basic objective. The current full-frontal attack of capital against the
achievements of the working class, its effort to exit from the economic crisis
by shifting the burden on the workers, prove that any achievements and gains of
the economic struggle can only be defensive, temporary and in danger of being
reversed, if they are not linked to the broader class struggle for a different
power which will work exclusively in favor of the working class and its allies.
Isolated from such a political struggle, the trade unions
can only develop within the working masses an economistic consciousness, which
is doomed to be subordinated to bourgeois ideology, as it aims only to improve
the position of the working class within the framework of capitalism; as it
exhausts the objectives of the working class only to the financial improvement,
either of the salaries or of the pensions etc. Those are improvements that the
governments can cancel at once e.g though the taxation of the working people.
For this reason, the pioneer representatives of the working class, Marx and
Engels, already in the middle of the 19th century, underlined the necessity for
the workers to struggle not only against the consequences of the capitalist
system, but, at the same time, against the system itself. They highlighted the
role of the trade unions as “an organized force for the overcoming of the
system of wage labour and capital”.
Historical experience itself has clearly shown that only
where the economic struggle of the working class in the trade unions was
harmoniously combined with the political struggle for power, in coordination
with the respective revolutionary parties, was it possible to abolish the
exploitation of human by human. Such a combination in the struggle, not only
does not limit it, but it facilitates wider strata of the working class to
overcome superstitions and illusions, to free themselves from bourgeois
ideology, to help in the construction of a real United Front of the working
class towards the promotion of its common interests. Such a unified movement
cannot be built through artificial welding or high-level agreements, but only
in a direction of revolutionary change of society.
b) “Independence” and “neutrality” vis-a-vis the
proletariat of other countries and its class-oriented trade union
organizations?
During the last two centuries, the needs of capital for
more and more markets for its commodities pushed it to expand in all corners of
the globe. “The bourgeoisie has, through its exploitation of the world market,
given a cosmopolitan character to production and consumption in every country”
(Communist Manifesto). The internationalization of capital, which has
intensified and multiplied since then, in the era of the transnational
monopolies and imperialism, has added new tasks and duties to the working
class, aside from the old ones. The labour movement wrote in its flags, next to
the slogan for the abolition of the exploitation, the slogan: “proletarians of
all countries, unite.”
Does this erase the old tasks of the working class in
each country? No! The struggle of the working class against capital is (at
least in form) first of all national. The proletariat of each country must
finish its “business” first and foremost with the bourgeoisie of its own
country.
However, the internationalization of capital’s activities
creates new necessities for an international coordination of the action of the
working class to confront: the common global strategy of the capitalists
against the workers (IMF, EU, World Bank, OECD etc.), the activity of the large
monopoly groups in many countries globally, the intensified danger for armed
conflicts and human sacrifices of the working class, due to rivalries between
the different parts of capital.
Does this international coordination of the proletariat
abolish the peculiarities and the particularities of the class struggle in each
country?
The class-oriented trade union movement and its
international organizations never underestimated the particular tasks that the
uneven development of capitalism in the various countries forces upon them.
However, they never feared to highlight the common principles and objectives
that ought to be the background of each consistent class struggle and that
determinately unify the interests and the action of the proletariat
internationally.
In our days, the hypocrisy of all the opportunist forces
in the trade union movement has been exposed. Look at the positions taken on
the imperialist attack against Libya in 2011, when 135,000 people were killed.
The leadership of ITUC, the trade union leaderships of CGT France, of CGIL
Italy and others like the British TUC, the German DGB, trade unions from
Netherlands, from Sweden, supported the imperialist war. Why? Their main goal
was for the bourgeoisie in their own country to win a bigger share from the
plundering of the oil, the natural gas and other wealth-producing resources of
Libya. From this plundering of the wealth of another People, the opportunists
take a small share, through privileges or through their salaries.
See the position of the sold-out leadership of CCOO Spain
in the crisis that took place on April 2012 between the two states of Argentina
and Spain, when there was a threat for a military confrontation triggered by
the “nationalization” of the Spanish monopoly Repsol-YPF by the government of
Argentina. This Spanish monopoly is stealing for 14 years the oil of Argentina.
The CCOO agreed officially and in writing with the Spanish government, the
capitalist owners of Repsol-YPF, with the European Commission and with all the
other thieves involved! Why? Because it gains from the plundering of the
natural resources and the exploitation of the working class of Argentina.
Though salaries, though privileges, it gets a share of the loot.
In both the abovementioned examples, the hypocrisy of the
opportunists who only in words talk about international solidarity and internationalism,
while in reality they exploit the international proletariat, is obvious.
c) “Neutrality” of a class-oriented trade union towards
the WFTU and the ITUC?
The necessity of struggle of the working class in each
country against the power of capital itself (not only against its results) and
the necessity of international coordination in the same direction make it clear
that the above question must be answered in the negative. The position and the
actions of ITUC and its basic organizations at the national level prove that
they have nothing to do with the real defense of working class interests, even
the immediate defensive ones, let alone the long-term ones. So, no
class-oriented trade union that respects its role and its mission, no true
trade unionist who wants to remain part of his class, can be captured in such a
fraudulent dilemma.
No one can claim that “our union is.. independent and
decides on its own”. This means it decides on its own to be with the servants
of the IMF and the World Bank? What do all these excuses mean? Whom do they
convince? No one!
The same mistake is done by some comrades who propose the
unification of WFTU and the ITUC! This is as if someone would propose the
unification of a revolutionary communist party with a social-democratic one, or
even with an ultra right-wing one. Like someone would try to unite oil with
water.
The workers have to realize that WFTU and ITUC have two
different historic roots, two different strategies, different objectives,
different ideologies and theoretical basis. It is impossible to unite these two
distinct lines, the one promoting the struggle against Capital and Imperialism
and the one leading to subordination to the objectives of Capital and of
Imperialism.
However, if we do assume that at some point some
bureaucratic leaderships would move forward with such a process of artificial
welding, it is for sure that the next moment, the process for a new
international class-oriented organization would begin, because its existence is
an objective necessity.
A general conclusion
All these theories that come and go have as a central aim
to justify the retreat, the compromises, the abandonment of the principles of
the class struggle. They have as an aim to create excuses for the collaboration
of trade union leaderships with the monopolies and their governments.
Finally, all these efforts aim to hide from the ordinary
people the truth: that those trade union leaderships have lost any contact with
the real interests of the working class and that, at the same time, they are
dangerous for the working class of the other countries.
We have the duty to expose in the eyes of the workers
those trade union leaderships and that political line. Until we drive away all
those types of “leaders” from the trade unions, as Lenin was writing and
underlining.
World Federation of Trade Unions
40, Zan Moreas Street, Athens 11745 Greece Tel. (+30)
2109214417, (+30) 2109236700, Fax (+30) 210 9214517 www.wftucentral.org E-Mail: info@wftucentral.org , international@wftucentral.org
No comments:
Post a Comment